|
View Full Version : What it all boils down to..... Titan Yapper 04-12-2006, 12:12 PM Who is the best of the three? Leinart, Young or Cutler. I've wanted Leinart for some time, but I have come to the realization that he isn't really that much better than Cutler. At least I don't think he is. If we can trade the pick to the Raiders, who are dazzled by Young. We get Cutler at 7 and then pick up some extra picks. I know I am making it sound so simple, but may be it really is. Trade down to seven get Cutler get extra picks. nomoreschwartz 04-12-2006, 12:22 PM 1st Choice - Vince Young 2nd Choice - Matt Lienart 3rd Choice - :doh: Jay Cutler TitanKid4Life 04-12-2006, 01:24 PM 1st Choice - Vince Young 2nd Choice - Matt Lienart 3rd Choice - :doh: Jay Cutler amen, ddc get this tag that me bipolar and metal have its the vince young group and i definately think that u should be in it 1st - Vince Young :nana3: 2nd - Cutler :doh: 3rd - Leinart :cuss: wplatham 04-12-2006, 08:20 PM The only question is if the Raiders are willing to trade up. TitanKid4Life 04-12-2006, 08:25 PM ****, the raiders are really liking vince young arent they, thats what i read somewhere around this site GLinks 04-12-2006, 10:16 PM Young Leinart Cutler. I don't know if we'd take Cutler anymore, unless we got a huge deal and he fell to us. Could be lack of hype, all's-quiet-on-the western-front stuff, but I think they'd rather stick and take VY or ML. Vigsted 04-13-2006, 06:56 AM ****, the raiders are really liking vince young arent they, thats what i read somewhere around this site I think they'd have to offer up an incredible deal to lure NO to trade that "far" down. NO would be giving up on a number of great guys that their team could really use. metal957 04-13-2006, 10:40 AM The Raiders would be fine to get the best possible player availible and then next year grab someone like Troy Smith from The Ohio State P.S. Where is EWKER's comment on this one. He should be praising this guy. nomoreschwartz 04-13-2006, 12:42 PM Young Leinart Cutler. I don't know if we'd take Cutler anymore, unless we got a huge deal and he fell to us. Could be lack of hype, all's-quiet-on-the western-front stuff, but I think they'd rather stick and take VY or ML. Okay....okay.....if he's there in the 7th...we can take him....:)) LazyManJackson 04-13-2006, 12:47 PM Hmmmmmmmm.......................... If he was middle 6th I'd take him nomoreschwartz 04-13-2006, 12:49 PM Hmmmmmmmm.......................... If he was middle 6th I'd take him Yeah, and then trade him for a back up kick off specialist....:ha: TitanKid4Life 04-13-2006, 01:40 PM I think they'd have to offer up an incredible deal to lure NO to trade that "far" down. NO would be giving up on a number of great guys that their team could really use. ya true but still somehow if they did get that spot that would ruin our chances of getting vince young :sad2: Gunny 04-13-2006, 10:19 PM Yeah, and then trade him for a back up kick off specialist....:ha: you do realise that when it is all said and done Cutler will be the best of the 3. Just because you don't want him so much. GLinks 04-14-2006, 12:22 AM you do realise that when it is all said and done Cutler will be the best of the 3. Just because you don't want him so much. Oh, the humanity. |