enough with wins and losses...

that kind of rational thinking about the 2006 Titans just makes one get depressed...

So I am introducing a new record metric to focus on for the rest of the season...

Watchable versus Embarrassing

Using that qualitative measure for the 2006 season, the titans are 5-3.

Watchable games: Jets, Miami, Indy, Washington, and Houston

Embarrassing games: SD, Dallas, Jags

That's a pretty complex method, I don't think it is practical enough for actual use.:rolleyes:

anything that puts us at 5 - 3 is good enough for me.

Let's see how far the rabbit hole goes.

Personally, I think Zackmann is nothing short of a genius. 5-3 it is!!

Vincent: And you know what they call a... a... a Quarter Pounder with Cheese in Paris?
Jules: They don't call it a Quarter Pounder with cheese?
Vincent: No man, they got the metric system. They wouldn't know what the $%#@ a Quarter Pounder is.
Jules: Then what do they call it?
Vincent: They call it a Royale with cheese.
Jules: A Royale with cheese. What do they call a Big Mac?
Vincent: Well, a Big Mac's a Big Mac, but they call it le Big-Mac.
Jules: Le Big-Mac. Ha ha ha ha. What do they call a Whopper?
Vincent: I dunno, I didn't go into Burger King.

now 6-3...

now 6-3...

I'll take it.

Hopefully next year we can update the metric to Dominate/competitive instead of watchable/embarrassing .

Hopefully next year we can update the metric to Dominate/competitive instead of watchable/embarrassing .
sounds great....

i like this system, itll work good for us but bad in the draft

now 7-3....