View Full Version : MIAMI TO TRADE McMICHEALS FOR 3RD PICK


TITANFANATIC911
03-03-2007, 12:14 PM
What do you guys think?

G GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+
2002 Miami Dolphins 16 16 39 485 12.4 45 4 8 1
2003 Miami Dolphins 16 16 49 598 12.2 46 2 8 1
2004 Miami Dolphins 16 16 73 791 10.8 42 4 9 1
2005 Miami Dolphins 16 16 60 582 9.7 30 5 4 0
2006 Miami Dolphins 16 16 62 640 10.3 24 3 5 0


"Young to McMichael" has a nice ring to it :monkey:

PitBull
03-03-2007, 12:19 PM
Heck no.

Childress79
03-03-2007, 12:54 PM
I second that motion:grrhee:

nigel
03-03-2007, 01:09 PM
Considering his legal troubles over the past couple years, I'd say there is zero chance of this happening.

Dangermode
03-03-2007, 02:14 PM
We ARE in serious need of TE help but I agree that Mcmichael aint the answer. I've said for months we should be in the Graham hunt but it looks like we've got some sort of other plans. TE in the draft? Who?

deeluxx3
03-03-2007, 02:18 PM
We ARE in serious need of TE help but I agree that Mcmichael aint the answer. I've said for months we should be in the Graham hunt but it looks like we've got some sort of other plans. TE in the draft? Who?


How are we in serious need of TE help? We have Ben Troupe and Bo Scaife...two very capable TEs. I dont see how we need help at all.

paraconspiracy
03-03-2007, 02:25 PM
troupe looks like the new calico...
scaife is an overachiever.

the only position we dont need help at is OT

Dangermode
03-03-2007, 02:35 PM
How are we in serious need of TE help? We have Ben Troupe and Bo Scaife...two very capable TEs. I dont see how we need help at all.

It depends on if you want a squad of "capable" players or quality playmakers. Troupe and Scaife ARE capable players but so are about a hundred other TE's in the NFL. Don't you want more than that? For Young?

moose4now
03-03-2007, 03:32 PM
We need a RB and a WR on offence long before we need a TE.

Banshee2
03-03-2007, 03:55 PM
It depends on if you want a squad of "capable" players or quality playmakers. Troupe and Scaife ARE capable players but so are about a hundred other TE's in the NFL. Don't you want more than that? For Young?

Umm, I think we're okay at TE for now. Scaife and VY have chemistry, which accounts for a LOT. Young LIKES Scaife. And we haven't really even begun to see what Ben Troupe can do. Only flashes his rookie year. Many players have a "sophomore slump" (See the Chosen One for example)

Better off spending money elsewhere, on a real position of need.

titansfan9
03-03-2007, 05:54 PM
We ARE in serious need of TE help but I agree that Mcmichael aint the answer. I've said for months we should be in the Graham hunt but it looks like we've got some sort of other plans. TE in the draft? Who?

we aren't in "serious" need either...

Gunny
03-03-2007, 05:57 PM
Not a fan of a man who mistakes his wife for a punching bag.

Riverman
03-03-2007, 06:15 PM
No.

I hope Troupe realizes those buckets attached to the end of arms are for catching footballs. (That is if the bucket on his shoulders can have him reading the D and executing the play).

Nine
03-03-2007, 06:52 PM
Aren't TE's supposed to be able to block and catch? We don't have one of those anywhere on the roster.

Not saying we should bring in McMicheal....I'm just saying that there is a need at TE.

Now if I could just convince the FO of that......

bongo59
03-03-2007, 08:36 PM
miami goal is to dump enough to get quinn.................and with welker bringing a two..........they might be getting close.