Trading #2

Wow cool. My grandfather taught there for 30 years, been going on trips to Starkville my whole life.

 

Webster's biggest problem is his bias towards UW players and taking them too high (Locker, Sankey)

 

Webster went to Ol Miss tho, wheres the Huskie love stemming from? Being in Seattle for a few years?

I dont recall too many Seahawks with Huskie backgrounds... Gonna look it up real quick.

 

Ok Im back, turns out zero Washington players were taken by Seattle during Websters time there....


Why the love for Washington players then.... Hmm, mystery goes on...

 

Maybe someone at UW got some dirt on him during his time in Seattle?

 

I think I would like to change my vote. Unless we get a crazy great package for number 2 (doub it, no one will believe we want a qb come draft time) I want to stay and take Leonard Williams. I would like to trade back from #33 and pick up an extra 3rd though. Still go with Nate Orchard in the 2nd then be able to pick the best available G and WR with our two 3rd round picks. This under the assumption we sign a CB in FA

 

I don't think taking two players high necessarily constitutes a pattern. But if it does, that gives me hope of him taking Danny Shelton. Hopefully not at #2 though.

 

I bet we'll have more offers for 33 than 2. At 33, certainly some great leftover players from the first will be there, and teams will jockey for position. I wouldn't mind moving back a few overalls if it meant we picked up an extra 2nd or 3rd.

 

I don't know why I never thought of trading back from 33. You have a good point.

 

Well if Melvin Gordon is there at #33 (which is doubtful IMO), I will cry if we don't take him.

I think this is finally the year where a RB goes in the 1st round. If Gordon is gone, but Gurley is still there (I think he will be due to ACL and durability concerns), I would take him as well.