#leet doe

Your judgment is off man, idk what you think you saw bUT it's wrong.

Wilson is a Top QB

Took me 2 years myself to see it but I saw it And belive it.

 

I do not dislike Russell. I was pulling for him. I'm just responding to this talk of him being elite. One day? Sure, he has the potential. But I see a lot of guys calling him elite when I see similar rookie type mistakes......same kind that we see mett make. Yet, mett gets zero respect. Russell has a top defense that makes up for his mistakes and an offense that's, what, top 10?

Just trying to call it like I see it. For the record, if we did not have mett, I would love to have Russell on this team.

 

I think, in his youth, kfc may have been a little better. The rest? That's a stretch. That being said, I think RW has more upside than kfc ever dreamt of.

Give mett the Seattle team and I believe he performs year for year comparably to RW. IMHO

 

I think we, fans and experts alike, are too quick to judge someone elite.

It takes time... people were wanting to call Flacco elite... sheesh.

 

The INT is not on Wilson but...

 

I only use stats to back up my claims. Since you use stats to define your players rather than watching them play consistently and understanding how the game of football works, here you go... Brady vs Wilson in their first three years as starters...

BRADY ​

2001 regular season (14 starts):
264/413 (63.9%), 2843 yards, 18 TD, 12 INT, 86.5 rating; 43 rush yards
Playoffs (3 starts):
60/97 (61.9%), 572 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 77.3 rating; 22 rush yards, 1 TD
2002 regular season (16 starts):
373/601 (62.1%), 3764 yards, 28 TD, 14 INT, 85.7 rating; 110 rush yards, 1 TD
(No playoffs)
2003 regular season (16 starts):
317/527 (60.2%), 3620 yards, 23 TD, 12 INT, 85.9 rating; 63 rush yards, 1 TD
Playoffs (3 starts):
75/126 (59.5%), 792 yards, 5 TD, 2 INT, 84.5 rating; 18 rush yards

WILSON​

2012 regular season (16 starts):
252/393 (64.1%), 3118 yards, 26 TD, 10 INT, 100 rating; 489 rush yards, 4 TD
Playoffs (2 starts):
39/62 (62.9%), 572 yards, 3 TD, 1 INT, 102.4 rating; 127 rush yards, 1 TD
2013 regular season (16 starts):
257/407 (63.1%), 3357 yards, 26 TD, 9 INT, 101.2 rating; 539 rush yards, 1 TD
Playoffs (3 starts):
43/68 (63.2%), 524 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT, 101.6 rating; 42 rush yards
2014 regular season (16 starts):
285/452 (63.1%), 3475 yards, 20 TD, 7 INT, 95 rating; 849 rush yards, 6 TD
Playoffs (3 starts):
41/72 (56.9%), 724 yards, 6 TD, 5 INT, 90.3 rating; 86 rush yards, 1 TD

TOTAL STATS - Includes all games, W/L record, total yards, and total TDs​

BRADY (39-12): 1089/1764 (61.7%), 11,847 total yards, 78 total TDs, 41 INTs, 85.4 rating

WILSON (42-14): 917/1454 (63.1%), 13,902 total yards, 97 total TDs, 32 INTs, 98.6 rating

If you need help interpreting this, feel free to let me know. You can PM me if you need to. The first thing you may notice is that Wilson started 5 more games... Wilson averaged 248 total YPG while Brady averaged 232 YPG. Simple math. Also, Wilson (8.1) had a better yard per attempt than Brady (6.6).

Since you cream your pants for stats, I figured you'd enjoy seeing that Wilson was basically better than Brady in every statistical category during their first three years as starters.

Sorry for repeatedly destroying you today... you asked for it.

I'll look forward to hearing your next lame ass rebuttal. You could simply admit that you are wrong. That would be the wise thing to do at this point. You've been proven wrong time and time again. So Wilson doesn't prove your eye test and you don't like his statistics? I don't know what else to tell you. This wasn't meant to demonstrate that Wilson is better than Brady, so don't reach for that BS. It was meant to show that Wilson is damn good, and you are a blind homer.

I certainly don't need to say anything else.

 

classic 520

 

what other limb has 520 climbed out on?

 

Yo wifes, right @520