Which trade do you take???

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by Titans2004, Apr 14, 2015.

?
  1. Chargers---Rivers and #17

    11.9%
  2. Browns--- #12, #19 and 2016 1st

    44.8%
  3. Rams--- Foles, #10, 1st and 2nd in 2016

    4.5%
  4. Bears---Cutler, #7. #39. and 1st and 3rd in 2016

    9.0%
  5. Jets--- #6, #37, and 1st in 2016

    7.5%
  6. Eagles--- #20, #19, #52, and 1st and 3rd in 2016

    10.4%
  7. take the pick at #2 being Mariota

    6.0%
  8. take the pick at #2 being LW

    6.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TitanJeff

    TitanJeff Kahuna Grande Staff

    30,461
    11,489
    1,769
    #12, #20, #52 and around #25 for the #2 in 2016? I'd jump all over it too.

    I don't think the Eagles would ever do it because they'd be giving up Bradford and a third-round to the Browns as well.
     
  2. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x The Real Slim Shady

    14,862
    5,085
    809
    If we traded with the Jets, which I think is the 2nd most likely team to trade up (Cleveland being 1st). Jets have a solid team (on paper).. at #6 you either go QB, OLB, or WR in this draft. The Jets already have Quentin Coples & Calvin Pace, who aren't stars.. but they're decent starters. At WR, they have Decker, Marshall, and Kerley.. so WR isn't a huge need. With the recent signings of Revis/Skrine, Cromartie/Milliner returning, and Richardson/Wilkerson developing that defense could be elite. They really are just an elite QB away from competing. It makes sense.

    #2 for #6, #37, & '16 1st

    6: Amari Cooper
    33: TJ Clemmings or best RT available
    37: Jordan Phillips
    66: Nate Orchard
    100: Buck Allen or Mike Davis

    I prefer Cooper to White. Cooper is one of the most sure-fire hits in the draft, while White has a higher ceiling, his floor is a lot lower as well. I could see Cooper having an Odell Beckham Jr type of impact. TJ Clemmings is the missing piece to our offensive line. We were the 31st ranked run D last year, which is a joke. Jordan Phillips is a massive 6'5 330 NT. This allows Sammie Lee Hill, who had a decent year at NT, to rotate over at DE and split time with Pito. LeBeaus defenses were also most successful with a massive front 3. Nate Orchard provides depth at OLB, especially needed with Orakpos health. Finish it off with a RB to split carries with Sankey and potentially be our starter.
     
  3. titanbaknedkly

    titanbaknedkly Starter

    94
    29
    214
    Not big on Cutler either but I am less enthusiastic about going into next season with Mett and Clipboard as our 2 QBs behind the same Oline as last year. We still have Levitre, Schwenke, and Warmack as our interior Oline and although Warmack played well down the stretch can anyone truly say if it was him turning the corner or all of our street guys getting beat faster than he was so he looked good.

    Cutler probably could benefit under Wiz systems like Rivers did. May not be the leader type that most want but fills the need of competition QB without taking us out of range for top talent. Be nice to trade back and still get the top talent you wanted at 2 without having to give up picks to trade back up. I always thought more picks is better with possibility of high future picks.
     
    • Cheers Cheers x 1
  4. Ontario Titan

    Ontario Titan Pro Bowler

    15,745
    4,035
    919
    I see your point if you're giving up 2 for a vet QB picking at 7 is much more appealing than 17
    I guess one way to look at it is...is having Rivers over Cutler worth dropping 10 draft spots?
     
  5. Titans2004

    Titans2004 Pro Bowler

    5,417
    1,744
    699
    I'd drop 10 draft spots to have Rivers rather than Cutler.
     
    • High Five High Five x 1
  6. satkins2252

    satkins2252 Starter

    411
    49
    344
    Ok. Can someone explain to me why anyone would trade with us? Who are they jumping ahead of by trading with us? The Rivers trade is the only trade that makes any sense to me. If someone's point is they're trading with us to prevent us from drafting they're QB then I would ask why would they do that? Obviously, if we are willing to trade the pick then we don't value the QB to draft them at 2. So then we would take them in spite of team/s for not trading?

    Please! Explain??
     
  7. Dirk Diggler

    Dirk Diggler Starter

    857
    535
    499
    NFL Draft Insider News: Week of April 20th

    That's disappointing.
     
  8. Aqutis30

    Aqutis30 Do you mind - NOT being a Motaur?

    11,035
    3,137
    909
  9. Two Kings

    Two Kings NJ Titan

    3,531
    1,185
    669
    Jets, Chargers, Redskings and Eagles all going to put the heat on the Browns. We'll see if the Browns cave. If they do, we get two 1sts and another second.

    That sounds good to me but I still like staying in the top ten with something like the Jets's 6th overall pick
     
  10. titans1839

    titans1839 Starter

    1,252
    400
    239
    Don't want it anyway. I really want a top 3 wr and not sure they will be there at 12. Just take the Jets 1st, 2nd and 1st next year. Maybe ask for a 4 this year or a 3rd next year just to have room to move down.
    1. Cooper
    2. Fisher
    2. Orchard
    3. Petty
    4. Coleman/Yeldon/Cobb
    5. G
    6. DE
    6. OT
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  • Welcome to goTitans.com

    Established in 2000, goTitans.com is the place for Tennessee Titans fans to talk Titans. Our roots go back to the Tennessee Oilers Fan Page in 1997 and we currently have 4,000 diehard members with 1.5 million messages. To find out about advertising opportunities, contact TitanJeff.
  • The Tip Jar

    For those of you interested in helping the cause, we offer The Tip Jar. For $2 a month, you can become a subscriber and enjoy goTitans.com without ads.

    Hit the Tip Jar