Some Interesting Stats

You obviously have no qb knowledge

 

We should make a forum awards show. Call it the Estys, like the Espys but for worst posts obvs. Kinda like the Razzies.

 

Well the team did actually do better with Locker as the starting QB.

View attachment 7181

Just looking at the offensive statistics, we averaged roughly the same number of pts per game with Locker and Mett (although it is still abysmal with both). But with Locker we averaged more 1st downs, more total yards per game, more passing yards per game (although it was close), more rushing yards per game, less turnovers, and more wins

If fact, Mett did not improve our team in any category compared to Locker.

This is just looking at last year, with Locker and Mett playing

 

k. Sure. Noone who watched hake last year will say he was playing good. Vs Cleveland ya, he looked decent. But no one with eyeballs will say Jake was a good QB last year. Many people with eyeballs said mett was one of the best rookie qbs last year. Your little credibility just flew out the window guy

 

It's refreshing to actually get TDs in the redzone instead of having to settle for 3 every time. Now lets see what MM8 can do against arguably the best defense in the game this week.

 

lol you were all over TR last year clowning Mett when Jake still had the job

this is why you cant be taken seriously, youre a flip flopper

 

lol. No. I was clowning them for thinking mett should start week 1. Then after a few games it was obvious Jake couldn't play good under whiz

 

uh huh.....

 

I'm trying my hardest to block out the past few years of our horrible QB play... VY, Grandpa Collins, Locker, Fitz, Rusty, CBJ, Hass and Mett. With as much alcohol I've had to drink to watch those games it's a miracle I even remember any of it.

Marcus looks solid and at least gives us hope. It's nice to at least be competitive after the first half.

 

We tried that a couple years ago,not enough interest