2007 Titans vs. 2000 Ravens

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by TitanJeff, Nov 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TitanJeff

    TitanJeff Kahuna Grande Staff

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,390
    As much as I hate the Ravens, they played Fisherball better than Fisher in 2000. Come playoff time, their defense is what dominated the playoffs.

    Here's a breakdown of the two teams on a per game average:

    2000 Ravens
    Defense vs. the run - 60 yards per game
    Defense vs. the pass - 198 yards per game

    Rushing from RBs
    122 yards per game - .5 TDs per game

    QB Production
    200 yards per game - 1.25 TDs per game

    2007 Titans
    Defense vs. the run - 66 yards per game
    Defense vs. the pass - 205 yards per game

    Rushing from RBs
    122 yards per game - 1 TD per game

    QB Production
    181 yards per game - .625 TDs per game

    Difference
    Run D - Ravens by 6 yards
    Pass D - Ravens by 7 yards
    Rush yards - Identical but Titans have double the TD production
    QB yards - Ravens by around 20 yards and they had double the passing TD production

    Draw your own conclusions.
    #1
  2. PitBull

    PitBull Bred to Brawl

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,945
    Great stats..
    Defense wins games.

    I no longer blame Schwartz. Well, for the meanwhile atleast.
    #2
  3. A Fightin'Titan

    A Fightin'Titan Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,454
    Interesting to see. They have us slightly but I think we haven't even seen our best. The Houston game could have been complete domination but we gave up alot of yards in the 4th. Same as TB on their last drive.
    #3
  4. Starkiller

    Starkiller 9

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    14,957
    OK, now compare the Patriots, Colts, and Steelers to the other teams back in 2000...

    I think the Ravens D and our D are somewhat comparable, but we aren't going to win unless VY can start playing decent football.
    #4
  5. Bayou Titan

    Bayou Titan Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2002
    Messages:
    295
    Starkiller is right... The 2000 Ravens didn't have to deal with the Patriot and Colt offenses... The Titans were the best team in the NFL that year and their offense was pedestrian.
    #5
  6. wg53

    wg53 Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2002
    Messages:
    756
    The Ravens also feasted off some of the worst offenses ever that year. We aren't play horrible offenses...atleast not to the kind that the ravens got to play that year.
    #6
  7. TitanJeff

    TitanJeff Kahuna Grande Staff

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,390
    I think that's a given. No one is saying the Titans are Super Bowl bound based on eight games but if they can limit the turnovers and get more production from Young, I like the thought of a strong defensive team who can run the football in January.
    #7
  8. TitanJeff

    TitanJeff Kahuna Grande Staff

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,390
    Both the Ravens and Titans played the Bengals and Browns twice who were horrible. The Titans also got the Cowboys when they were baaaaaaaad.
    #8
  9. MJTitans

    MJTitans Chris Whitley look him up Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,890
    We see it every year - teams that are exciting in September often struggle in January. We obviously aren't in the class of the Colts and Pats (using the term "class" loosely on that last one), but we've shown we can go toe-to-toe with Indy every time. That's a dangerous team in the playoffs. I still wouldn't put any bets on us going deep in the playoffs this year, but we finally appear to have the foundation of a team that will be in the elite for the next several years. If we continue to see improvement from VY and we can keep the core of the defense together I like the chances of a SB in the next 5-6 years.
    #9
  10. bulluck4dMVP

    bulluck4dMVP Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2003
    Messages:
    2,265
    Bingo budddaaaay :grrhee:
    #10
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.