Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by Scarecrow, Feb 15, 2013.
Maybe I will take with my first pick
Lions might really do that
When are we starting this thing?
not sure if this was addressed previously..but two guys are the "rams"
ugh ill fix it when i get home
I really wouldn't have minded it. It would've been a somewhat interesting, challenging pick. They will lose Kruger and/or Ellerbe, possibly Boldin and Reed, Birk retired, and they're going to spend $20M a year on Flacco lololololol... My username may be coming to fruition.
So they now need huge help at FS, LB, C, and possibly WR. That's quite a lot for the world champions.
A lot of my hate for the Ravens is gone now that the murderer is gone, but I will always love to see them fail. No doubt about that. Hope they crash and burn along with the Steelers, as we somehow find a way to rise to the occasion and hoist the Lombardi trophy (within the next decade, hopefully).
And guys... try to legitimately pick players the teams need.
I'm calling it right now though... Raiders will take Cordarelle Patterson at #3. Doesn't that sound like a classic Raiders move?
Honestly the Lions should take Patterson if he's there (which he truly should be). They need to get Stafford someone other than Megatron, and if Patterson pans out in the NFL... you're looking at the equivalent of the Falcons' White/Jones duo.
Patterson is going to be the draft's biggest reach this year. He should be going between 20-32. He will likely go to the Jets (IMO) if he falls that far.
HEY I'M MAKING THE RAIDERS PICK HOW ABOUT YOU TRY AND NOT DO MY JOB FOR ME (THAT'S A GOOD IDEA THO)
Lol that's just what I think they will do... because they're stupid. Simply making a prediction.
Not what I or anyone on here should do with the pick though.
oh thats because the Rams have two first rounders......don't scare me like that.