and with the first 2 rounds of the nfl draft done

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by griff33daddy, Feb 14, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. griff33daddy

    griff33daddy Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,271
    http://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Mock-Draft-A.php

    what would you guys think if we took gabbert over aj green if he fell that far to us??? i mean really lol would you really pass on a guy even though wr isnt our biggest need when he has so much potential
    #21
  2. griff33daddy

    griff33daddy Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,271
  3. ScotTitan

    ScotTitan Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    860
    #23
  4. RavensShallBurn

    RavensShallBurn Ruck the Favens

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    20,522
    If Green is there we have to take him. If Peterson is there we have to take him.

    Neither positions are our biggest needs, but you can't pass on guys like this.

    That being said, I don't see any way either of them fall to us unless something happens from now and the draft that changes opinions on them.
    #24
  5. Soxcat

    Soxcat Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,487
    #25
  6. griff33daddy

    griff33daddy Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,271
    i think it might have to do with tulloch being a fa if we dont resign him im not sure...
    #26
  7. Deuce Wayne

    Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    28,248
    I disagree.

    AJ Green isn't a top 10 pick to me. I know he'll be selected in the top 10... but as far as value goes? Not worth it.

    He's really nothing great. He padded stats vs some of the worst pass defenses in the country and made a 1 handed catch... he's always seemed a bit weak to me.



    If other teams can pass on players...so can we.
    #27
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.