Are you for or against the NFL eventually putting a team in another country?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by mike75, May 13, 2013.

?

Are you for or against a team eventually being put in another country?

  1. I am for the NFL putting a team in another country

    3 vote(s)
    10.7%
  2. I am against the NFL putting a team in another country

    21 vote(s)
    75.0%
  3. Not sure

    4 vote(s)
    14.3%
  1. Big TT

    Big TT Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    7,874
    Could work. Cowboys have a huge following I understand in mexico.
    #11
    • High Five High Five x 1
  2. TorontoTitanFan

    TorontoTitanFan Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,297
    The NFL has nothing to gain from watering down the current product, which is TV ratings gold. There aren't even enough good starting quarterbacks for 32 teams. I don't see expansion on the horizon any time soon.

    That leaves relocation. I could see a team or two moving to London or Toronto. I don't think it would change things too much for fans in the US, frankly, so I don't know why people would be against it. I don't know that it's something we'll see happen any time soon, though. There are way too many impediments: lack of stadiums, time zone issues, loss of revenue (TV ratings in other countries don't count), etc.
    #12
    • High Five High Five x 2
  3. memphis_raven

    memphis_raven Starter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Messages:
    913
    I think Toronto and Mexico City are good options but it would be tough to fly to Europe on a regular basis for teams in the division. Its bound to happen though...
    #13
  4. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    45,329
    Whats the economy like outside of Mexico City? Is it even safe to walk down the street?
    #14
  5. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    45,329
    Ive been thinking a lot about the Jags going out to LA, but then I realized LA wont embrace a losing team, so they'd eventually leave LA just as every other NFL team has.
    #15
  6. Deuce Wayne

    Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    28,242
    In Canada- ok.

    Anywhere else? No.

    The jet-lag would be hell on players. It'd mess them up for 2 weeks or more.
    #16
    • High Five High Five x 2
  7. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    26,208
    As far as Mexico City, can Americans even own land in Mexico? I thought that was made illegal by the Mexican government. How do you expect players to live in Mexico without being able to own a house, rent? I'll be damned if I'm a 30-year old millionaire renting a house.
    #17
  8. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,831
    More to the point, asking players to move countries is a big big ask.
    #18
    • High Five High Five x 1
  9. Big TT

    Big TT Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    7,874
    With straight lines like this...wait for it....They are already asked to live in Detroit. LOL Third world country no less. LOL Cue dunce rebuttal.
    #19
  10. Titan43

    Titan43 Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    Messages:
    3,300
    I'm not 'against' having teams on other countries. I'd be okay with it if it were Mexico or Canada. Europe is just to far away though IMO. It makes travelling to difficult. We already complain when travelling to play west coast teams
    #20