With so many talking heads on tv and radio making their opinions known we need a thread to comment on them. After all they get paid for their "expert" commentary and we get nothing for our comments here. Also what i noticed is that there is a laziness in a lot of analysis where they blurt out things that sound good, sound logical without bothering to be informed. That was the case with Marshall Faulk yesterday on NFL network. In his commentary about the Colts vs Denver game he said this, paraphrasing......"Chuck Pagano's defensive schemes with the Ravens have given Peyton trouble in the past. Pagano knows how to game plan him." FACT: Pagano was a D-coordinator for just one year in 2011 for the Ravens. That was the year Manning didn't play because of the neck injury. Peyton manning has never played against a Chuck Pagano defense! Manning did play against the Ravens in 2009 when Pagano was secondary coach. The entire basis for Faulk's comments was wrong! We see examples like this all the time. Jim Irsay is not an analyst but his comments about Peyton and comparing him to brady were also ignorant. Brady's career stats are just about as good as Peyton's.