CB in the First, or Possibly S -- Deal With It

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by The Hammer, Mar 31, 2013.

  1. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    13,796
    4,621
    609
    Bulluck
    #11
    • High Five High Five x 1
  2. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    13,796
    4,621
    609
    Pollard is the same age as Griffin. He turned 28 in Dec, Levitre turns 27 in May.
    #12
  3. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    17,905
    8,065
    689
    Fair enough.. Still though he is on a one year deal. Clearly not in their long term plans. He may be one day. As of today he is not.
    #13
  4. ColtKiller

    ColtKiller Starter

    3,556
    987
    239
    That's pure speculation.
    #14
  5. GTFO my pancakz

    GTFO my pancakz S.D.M.F.

    1,456
    541
    269
    Isn't the entire future of football speculation?
    #15
  6. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    17,905
    8,065
    689
    Of course it is :)
    #16
  7. UrbanLegend3

    UrbanLegend3 Starter

    4,402
    2,283
    419
    Yes but as with opinions the more rooted in fact they are the more likely they are to be correct.
    #17
  8. ImATitan

    ImATitan Starter

    5,819
    1,301
    379
    No way they go S in the 1st.. I can definitely see CB though.. With OG or DL being the backup plan.
    #18
  9. RollTide

    RollTide All-Pro

    20,753
    2,989
    1,059
    Rhodes certainly had the kind of workout you look for in a CB that high. 6'1 1/2 210 with 4.39 speed and a 40 inch vertical is a 10th pick caliber athlete. If he shows the same on film i would have no problem with that pick.

    There are no linebackers i could see us taking with that pick and the inside linebackers are deep going into the middle rds. You could get a guy like AJ klein with our late 3rd or even our 4th.

    Reaching for a guy like Mintor or Olgletree is doubtful.

    Safety is also a very deep position when you can get a guy like Reid at 39 why draft Vacarro at 10?
    #19
  10. Scarecrow

    Scarecrow CEO of PPO Tip Jar Donor

    23,641
    11,792
    889
    Man, I feel like I have made a pretty good case on why Ogletree is not a reach. To each their own, I just feel like the depth drops off drastically compared to other positions. Thats not the sole reason I think we should go Ogletree though.
    #20