CB in the First, or Possibly S -- Deal With It

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by The Hammer, Mar 31, 2013.

  1. Carp

    Carp Starter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    403
    I would wager 11 million fake dollars that we don't go safety in the first. CB is a possibility, but that isn't anything we didn't already know.

    1st pick will be either OL, DE, or CB unless we trade back/up.
    #21
  2. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    45,329
    CB or safety 1st round makes plenty of sense since IMO neither Verner or Griffin will be here this time next year.

    If a DB is BPA at 10 I believe we take them.
    #22
    • High Five High Five x 1
  3. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16,393

    Ogletree would be perfect for the Bengals.
    #23
  4. xhrr

    xhrr Starter

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,835
    I'll cry if we take Kenny. Elam is better than him.

    I think Rhodes is a very likely pick.
    #24
  5. 2ToneBlueBlood

    2ToneBlueBlood On Twitter @2ToneBlueBlood

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    1,885
    I've heard/read a lot that the Titans really like Trufant. I don't think he's worth a pick at 10 but maybe this is an indication that they are going to try to trade back. Maybe the best move IMO unless a stud drops to them. Like someone said earlier, CB is the only position of need they haven't addressed and there are/were some great CB's available in FA. This tells me they're targeting a CB in the 1st or they think Sensabaugh or Campbell will suffice.
    #25
  6. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16,393
    So in other words they are targeting a CB in the first ;)
    #26
    • High Five High Five x 1
  7. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16,393

    People were shocked at taking a WR last year in the first. And yet here we are this year all saying WR is a position we need to be looking at. So obviously WR was not a bad pick this year.

    We do not have good Safeties. We have stop gap players. CB beyond McCourty is not much better.
    #27
  8. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,461
    I wouldn't be shocked by seeing Trufant at #10.
    #28
  9. Luke Smartwater

    Luke Smartwater Jedi Master

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,083
    I would not be surprised if we draft a OT at #10. I think that is more of a chance than picking a guard. Assuming that Joeckel and Fisher will be gone before we pick, there is a possibility that Johnson will still be available. He could start at RT and Stewart would move to RG.
    #29
  10. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    Messages:
    16,393
    I could see an OT at 10 too. Though I think the rook would play guard for a year or two. Waiting for Stewart's usefulness to run out.
    #30