Draft Prospects Begin Visits to Titans

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by goTitans.com, Apr 6, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dman050586

    dman050586 Starter

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2002
    Messages:
    191
    Well the saints just traded their LT to the falcons. to ferguson now looks 2 b a lock at # 2. that means we will have the choice of all three QBs. i hope that we pick young!!!
    #11
  2. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,373
    also means the Saints can trade down to someone who wants one of the QBs.
    #12
  3. SEC 330 BIPOLAR

    SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,087
    [​IMG]
    Jeff, perhaps you should add this smilie tag to the menu...
    #13
  4. no i realized the sarcasm but i just wanted a straight answer
    #14
  5. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    25,437
    very good point.
    #15
  6. Riverman

    Riverman That may be....

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    8,251
    [​IMG]

    We could be opening against Leinart's team.
    #16
  7. fltitan

    fltitan Guest

    Jets trade up to #2 and N.O. moves to #4 Jets take Leinart Titans take Young NO still gets Ferguson. Makes a lot of sense for NO.
    #17
  8. dontdraftcutler

    dontdraftcutler Go Cutler!

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,557
    Love it!!!!:ha:
    #18
  9. Soxcat

    Soxcat Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,485
    If they want Brick the Jets might be the only team they could deal with. If they were willing to settle for Justice of course they could trade down further. The point is they put themselves in a postion to draft a LT as a high priority.
    #19
  10. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,373
    true true.
    which means if Reggie doesnt go #1, the saints could trade out and he could go #2.
    #20
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.