Haynesworth has made more money not playing

so you'd rather be haynesworth-less for 16 games instead of 4?

 

It's a toss up to whether or not Hayensworth has increased his stock by staying out.

Has he shown how vulnerable the Titans D is without him, or has he shown that in fact he cannot stay healthy?

 

Who has final say as to whether or not he plays? Him or the staff.

 

Like I said. DT first pick next year. Even with Haynesworth. Get a dominating DL.

 

I agree with you. My first thought was money may be lost because he is proving he cannot stay healthy for 16 games.

But I was speaking in general about hamstrings and how they weaken each time they are injured. It is not an injury you can really play with at 90% without a major risk of re-injury.

 

Haynesworth MAKES us a dominant DLine. With him in every D Lineman looked like a probowler, now we can't get to the quarterback at all giving them all day in the pocket to pick apart our secondary.

 

A kid on my football team injured his hammy as a junior, wasnt even good enough to go his senior year, so i know this can be a serious injury, but I want a real idea of where hes at, not "Hes close, were just being safe"

 

We'll franchise him and see....end of thread.

 

I agree. He's close just isn't cutting it. He was close the week of Jacksonville, now three weeks later he still isn't ready. I'm going to be awfully upset if by sitting Haynesworth we don't make the playoffs ( which is becoming a reality ), and get rid of him next year.