Hypothetical Trade: #10 for #23 & #25?

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by xpmar9x, Mar 23, 2013.

?

#10 for #23 & #25 - Yes or No?

  1. Yes

    14 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. No

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. TheSureThing

    TheSureThing WHY DIDNT YOU DRAFT JOHNNY FOOTBALL?!?

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    7,385
    everyone would except the Vikings IMO #10 not worth 23 and 25
    #11
  2. RollTide

    RollTide All-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    20,211
    I would make that trade and take Fluker with that 23rd pick if there. You should get an extra 3rd and 4th rd pick at least for that and that gives us extra picks for that inside linebacker in the third(Riddick or bostic) and maybe a Wr like bailey or Hamilton in the 4th.

    yes absolutely.

    Anybody who thinks Austin is equal to Harvin is delusional.
    #12
  3. RollTide

    RollTide All-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    20,211
    Vikings would make the trade if they know that Patterson is still there at 10. He would be the guy they would be looking to get and they might be interested in Nate Washington as part of a deal like that.
    #13
  4. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,493
    I'd rather two late firsts vs one early first. So yes I would.
    #14
    • High Five High Five x 1
  5. The Hammer

    The Hammer Straight Ridah

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    Messages:
    15,874
    Would the Vikings be dumb enough to go for that?
    #15
  6. Luke Smartwater

    Luke Smartwater Jedi Master

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,056
    That is a no brainer. Unless you are absolutely sure that the guy you are drafting at #10 is going to be a superstar, you have to make this trade. You can land some excellent players in the late 1st Rd.
    #16
  7. Just Win Baby

    Just Win Baby Practice Squad

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Messages:
    77
    Nate would most likely have to be part of the deal b/c fair value dictates we would have to throw in our 4th round pick to get close to equal value. So if we offered Nate and they took it then it would be like we were getting a 4th for him, which is the best we could hope for.
    #17
  8. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,807
    This makes me think back to the McNair trade, really hope we don't draft another Chris Davis type of scrub with a 4th if this trade idea ever happened.

    Nate for some bum ass WR like Davis would SUCK
    #18
  9. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,397
    I still don't get why everyone wants to trade Nate. He's our best receiver.
    #19
  10. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    43,807
    [​IMG]
    #20