King: Titans may enter bidding for Wallace

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by SlidePiece, Mar 6, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SlidePiece

    SlidePiece Starter

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    1,335
  2. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    46,144
    Aint happening, Peter King has lost his damn mind.
    #2
  3. HeadOnASwivel

    HeadOnASwivel Starter

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,579
    No way this is happening. Wallace is a punk and waaay overrated anyway. If they are going to go after a receiver in free agency it had damn well better be Jennings.
    #3
    • High Five High Five x 1
  4. pepsidriver24

    pepsidriver24 @snydzie

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    466
    This one took me by surprise. Definitely shows the Titans may want to shake things up at WR. Probably just wanting a playoff vet or proven leader kind of like they are looking for on defense right now.
    #4
  5. Scarecrow

    Scarecrow CEO of PPO

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    21,823
    Eh, Wallace is not the guy I want.
    #5
  6. SlidePiece

    SlidePiece Starter

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    1,335
    Couldn't disagree more fellas, Wallace is a difference maker. Wyatt said two days ago that the team would likely bring in a vet receiver, I was thinking more along the lines of a Steve Breaston type, not a guy that would actually make a difference on the field.

    I'd be all for it, but even if they do have interest, I can't see the Titans being the highest bidder.
    #6
    • High Five High Five x 2
  7. JCBRAVE

    JCBRAVE Tweet me @JCBRAVE

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    46,144
    It's not the pursuit for Wallace thats silly, it's what he's going to want to be paid.

    Adding Wallace makes a lot of sense, but paying him top dollar to be a No.2 doesn't.
    #7
  8. cdubbs2121

    cdubbs2121 Starter

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,865
    LOL whose our number one? Britt? Really? C'mon.
    #8
    • High Five High Five x 5
  9. Scarecrow

    Scarecrow CEO of PPO

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    21,823
    im not going to argue if we got Wallace, because the need is certainly there. Really opens up the draft also and makes Cook an after thought.
    #9
  10. JMUTitan

    JMUTitan Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    212
    I think this would definitely make sense for us. Kenny britt isn't going to be with us after next season (hopefully). Why not ensure we keep our WR corps strong long after his departure? (Granted britt really hasn't done much for us) Wallace is a solid #1 and paired up with wright, we could have a really solid set of WRs. Sign him to a 5 year contract and we won't have to worry about drafting a WR and hoping he pans out.

    Wallace is proven and would provide some excitement among the fan base that would make up for the "unsexy" pick of a guard in the first. I like it.
    #10
    • High Five High Five x 3
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.