Lets be real here. Coaching doesnt matter.

I tend to agree although your percentages are too exaggerated.

I think in college, coaching is much more important. In the pro's, it's more about the personnel. Still, if you are a terrible NFL coach (or even just stuck in your ways) you can ruin a team regardless of the players.

 

you are totally wrong

how much 'talent' has Snyder and the Redskins had???

 

Congratulations! It's only january and you've already won dumbest thread statement of the year!

 

Would people agree with the following statement...


In the NFL, players > coaches when it comes to success.

In college, coaches > players when it comes to success.


That is my opinion. I'm including ability to recruit when it comes to coaches in college.

 

Matt Flynn put in one of the best passing performances this year as a Packer.

When Rodgers stepped in, he did the same thing to Brett Favre.

That reasoning leads me to believe that the "system" has a lot to do with Green Bay's QB success.

 

I agree with you, but it is the coach that LEADS. So I think a team could have great talent but without leadership, the team doesn't succeed. All team games are based on war. You can have great generals and great officers, but if the ground troops don't want to fight, you lose. We now have a good general. We have to draft some more good troops and we can win any war. Fisher was an example, at least in the last few years, of a general who let the troops run the war. didn't work.

 

Oh!

Another example...



The NEW YORK JETS

 

Having great players help, but this isn't high school, you can't just line up and run and expect to win regularly. You're overlooking coaching a good bit.

Do you think Jason Pierre-Paul would be where he's at without coaching?

Matt Flynn wouldn't do what he does without a great QB coach in Green Bay.

 

Alex Smith? Bust until this year, now in the playoffs.....New head coach!