Discussion in 'Smack Central' started by World Peace, Jun 13, 2012.
Still glad they took him instead of RG3 though.
Can you imagine us trying to defend RG3?
what is the issue with it.
2 RBs vs 1, GoT.
well its not like a TE, now that would be scarry
Packers D is still rated better than Atlanta, Cincy, Jets, Giants, Pats, Panthers, Ravens.....
I won't even comment on where the Vikings D is rated.
Main thing is that Luck was the main reason the Colts won last week and RG3 didn't do squat.
RGIII couldn't. He got knocked out of the game with a mild concussion.
Prior to that he was playing as well as he usually does.
Did you seriously just mention the Pats and Panthers as teams who are supposed to have good defenses?
Packers D is alright.
Again answer this dip shiate , Locker or Luck?
If you say Locker you have ZERO CRED!
Here I'll make it easier for you jsuck.
Does Luck suck? If you answer yes than you are certifiable retarded!
Myopia runs ramped in Butcher Holler.
I never once said Luck would suck, but I said he wouldn't be as good as everyone was expecting and that RG3 would be better.
Too early to tell which of the two are better, but I was probably wrong in even saying that he wouldn't live up to expectations.
Separate names with a comma.