Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Titan Cup/Fantasy Football' started by ammotroop, Aug 16, 2009.
Based on what?
His entirely superior year then Forte's?
You don't win fantasy much do you?
LOL...Gunny, I want you to go look at 10 fantasy football sites and see what Forte's ranking is and then go look at Portis ranking. Why do they think so much differently then you?
Forte - 8 TD's, 1238 yrds on 316 carries ---- RUSHING
4 TD's 488 yrds 63 receptions------------- RECIEVING
Portis - 9 TD's 1487 Yrds on 342 carries ----- Rushing
0 TD's 218 YRDS on 28 Receptions ---- RECIEVING
Not only do the numbers back up Forte, but Portis has a lot of wear and tear on him. He is a good back no doubt about that, but he is not ranked higher than Forte in FF.
Forte is rank pretty high in all the drafts I have seen. I think the addition of Cutler might be good or bad though. Cutler is going to want to throw more and the Bears are going to want to use him for that. It might reduce his carries and rec because Cutler will be looking for a WR not dumping off to his back.
Where did LT fall to?
Call me crazy but I've got him and D-Will in the top 5.
I agree about Dwill, but not about LT. He is just aged, but I am probably wrong.
I'm one of the few that LT has a big year still left in the tank. He's healthy again and highly motivated by San Diego reportedly not wanting to sign him back. JMO.