This argument we picked Locker over Kaep because he fit Palmer's offense is almost beyond ridiculous. As if Locker was some West Coast QB or something. Locker and Kaep are actually pretty similar in their attributes and it we wanted to really get a Palmer guy it might have been Dalton or Ponder. The other comment that takes the cake is saying Kaep was "exposed" in the SB. My goodness what game were people watching? The 49er offense was running up and down the field and with little running game for the most part with ease against the vaulted Raven's defense. Kaep threw for 300 yards, a 91 QB rating (also rushed for 62 yards). The only reason he wasn't lifting up the SB MVP of that game was because of a blown coverage by the 49ers secondary and a kick return. The guy is making his 10th start of his career, in the SB, against the Ravens and simply goes out and plays lights out. Did anyone notice the 49ers wer behind 28-6 just into the 3rd qt of that game? People are all over Flacco and how Brady like his performance was but Kaep was his equal without a doubt. But if that was Brady briging his team back from that kind of deficit people would be slobbering all over how studly he is despite the loss. But it is Kaep so he was "exposed". Nonsense.