I'm very aware. Players get shopped all the time... doesn't mean they're gone. This is the first I have heard that Munchak is not pleased with Nate though. Do you have any evidence to back that up or is it an assumption? If you're assuming Munch isn't happy with Nate just because we had him on the trade block, you could be very wrong. It's a business... part of it. By cutting Hawkins, we save $1.2mil and don't have to worry about filling his void. By cutting Nate, we save $4.2 mil, but we suffer an actual loss. So, while there's a $3mil difference there, I don't see the point in cutting your best, most reliable WR instead of cutting your worst one.