Does anyone like Paul Kuharsky? I don't get why he has a job. 1. He's extremely boring. 2. He's a dickhole. 3. His opinions are the only wrong ones.
I can't remember what I argued with him over twitter about now. But he had the worst response/rebuttal ever.
Oh! I do remember. Him claiming Gabbert was better than Henne and was making the argument that Gabbert was going to be good because... get this... The "jags believe in him". Well, that cements it! Hall of famer!
A couple of times he asked questions of FB, I'd comment, he'd ask me to elaborate, I would do so, he would basically call me stupid, then his blog or whatever for the day would pretty much mirror my comments.
Overpriced tequila. It isn't all that great. They do make a rum that is really good. Way better than their tequila. If you see it, grab it. You can find better tequila for cheaper.
Kuharsky is nothing more than a pessimistic critic. The article yesterday bashing Locker on the way he responded to his accuracy issues. Why can't he ever have an inkling of positivity? I mean, Flacco was always bashed for his completion % in his first several years? Look at him now... Never threw for more than 4K or had less than 16 turnovers. Now he is a Super Bow MVP. All Kuharsky wants to do is talk about everyone's weaknesses, and generally it's never about production as a whole on the field. Now he wants to act like Locker is avoiding his accuracy problem or denying it as though he needs to attend an Inaccurate QBs Anonymous meeting or something. I want to see real world comparisons or meaningful stats. Not this bullshizz.