Welcome to goTitans.com! Log in or sign up to be a part of the best Tennessee Titans fan site available.

RB's as WR's?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by JCBRAVE, Sep 26, 2013.

Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 3 users.
  1. JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Casey
    Messages:
    42,539
    Moolah:
    $217,634
    I have a question. Why is nearly every NFL team using RB's as WR's?

    Its a decoy play vs man coverage, but the plays Ive seen never equate to first downs.

    Why is this happening if it doesnt work?
  2. Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Casey
    Messages:
    25,369
    Moolah:
    $13,529
    Keeps regular personnel on the field, which keeps the defense's regular personnel on the field. Causes mismatches.
    FLA Titans Fan high fives this.
  3. JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Casey
    Messages:
    42,539
    Moolah:
    $217,634
    Ok well it doesnt work tho. Why ia every team I watch doing it if its not producing yards?
  4. Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Casey
    Messages:
    25,369
    Moolah:
    $13,529
    It helps define coverage too. If a linebacker runs out there with the back you know it's man-to-man.
    titan520 high fives this.
  5. JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Casey
    Messages:
    42,539
    Moolah:
    $217,634
    They know its man when they send the RB out to play WR.

    I can see it confirms the coverage but it essentially takes out one of your players.
  6. Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Casey
    Messages:
    25,369
    Moolah:
    $13,529
    Well if the linebacker vacates the middle of the field it opens up space for an inside receiver.

    Haven't you ever played Madden!? This is basic ****!
  7. JCBRAVE @JCBRAVE

    Casey
    Messages:
    42,539
    Moolah:
    $217,634
    This is True
  8. rodgev Starter

    Brown
    Messages:
    1,088
    Moolah:
    $1,059
    You would think that you could line up the Rb at Wr to start the play and motion him back to the backfield the LB would still have to motion this defining coverage right?
  9. Gut Starter

    Messages:
    3,731
    Moolah:
    $1,078
    All of the above are correct. Teams aren't so much looking at coverage (man or zone) as much as they are looking matchups. In our regular personel, if we put our 2 WR's in the slot and the 2 outside players are a TE and a rb, who is covering them, are they playing off or is a S rolling over the top. This grouping can work to your favor in a variety of ways. First, if it's man, defines most of the coverage (still have to watch for traps and rotations) and who the matchup is. If it's zone, can allow the CB to take out the TE or RB while your best WR attacks the middle of the D! Another good option against zone is the bubble screen to the WR or in this case, the RB! You can get a numbers advantage if you snap it on time!

    Some teams do come out in that look and motion the running back back into the backfield...just seeing how the defense would play it. With some of these formations, you can really figure how the defense is gonna cover different ppl.

    Gut
  10. Ensconatus Namaste

    Brown
    Messages:
    9,692
    Moolah:
    $24,669
    Damn... Fry schooled Braved...

Share This Page