Welcome to goTitans.com! Log in or sign up to be a part of the best Tennessee Titans fan site available.

Schwartz Given Two-Year Extension

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by TitanJeff, Jan 28, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 4 users.
    • Tip Jar Donor

    CheeseheadTitan Starter

    Wright
    Messages:
    3,128
    Moolah:
    $482
    This was a moot point two pages ago, and is still a moot point. We are stuck with the slug for two more years.

    I hope I am wrong here, and will be the first to admit if I am, but nothing I have seen in his entire tenure here (pretty much as a slug) changes my opinion, which I pretty much have maintained since 2001.
    #81
  1. Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Casey
    Messages:
    25,169
    Moolah:
    $13,040
    with haynesworth we were 5th, without him we went right back to where we were last year, last.

    the first eight games with haynesworth healthy: 15.5 points per game given up. also inflated by the fourth quarter schwartzing against houston.

    the three games without haynesworth: 32.33 points per game given up.

    last five games with haynesworth post-injury: 15.2 points per game given up. this too was inflated by the schwartzing of the chargers game.

    if you want to lie to yourself and say schwartz was the reason the defense was improved this year, go ahead.
  2. Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Martin
    Messages:
    27,570
    Moolah:
    $15,536
    uh. All the evidence supports this, Schwartz.
  3. Psychop1 Big Tee

    Washington
    Messages:
    2,402
    Moolah:
    $4,754
    In the last five games, the defense gave up 15.2 points a game on average, yet Haynesworth had one sack and ten tackles TOTAL over the last five games. Now, why is that??? We could all see that he was playing spot duty, and he was basically average at best when he was playing those last five games, so why do some pretend like he was this maniacal force that brought our respectability back during that final stretch???

    He only proved to be in those last five games to be what he's been most of his pro career i.e. a big body that fills the middle. Don't get me wrong. During the first half of the season, he was definitely dominate, and a worthy all-pro. He never fully recovered from his injury, however. Some of you will simply go to great lengths not to give Schwartz any credit.
  4. Psychop1 Big Tee

    Washington
    Messages:
    2,402
    Moolah:
    $4,754
    I got your evidence swingin'. :nana2:
  5. Kid Gloves Guest

    Messages:
    0
    I think it's simple. With AH; we can run the type of D we want to. Without him, we can't. When he's in, the D doesn't have to worry about his area of responsibilities and can attack from other angles.
  6. Psychop1 Big Tee

    Washington
    Messages:
    2,402
    Moolah:
    $4,754
    I could understand that excuse more if we were talking about a DB, but D-Line is different. In limited capacity, Haynesworth was better than Starks. Somehow, I'm the only one who remains unimpressed.

    Let's remember, this about Schwartz, and how Haynesworth saved his career. :rolleyes:
  7. Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Martin
    Messages:
    27,570
    Moolah:
    $15,536
    So, Jim. How does it feel to be your only supporter?
  8. Psychop1 Big Tee

    Washington
    Messages:
    2,402
    Moolah:
    $4,754
    Keep fighting the good fight. You're gaining ground on this argument...
  9. Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Martin
    Messages:
    27,570
    Moolah:
    $15,536
    This argument has been over for about 4 years.

    you're the only one left on your side.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page