Should be consider Hunter and Patterson?

After looking at some of the defensive line prospects heading out of the SEC I began to consider the possibility of the two Vols receivers. Either would be an upgrade and would provide addition weapons to work with. They could be ready to contribute from word go. There's more on those two below but what do we think?

http://www.downattheone.com/NFL/NFL-Scouting-Combine-coverage-SEC-East-Preview

I wouldn't even consider touching wr til the 3rd at the absolute earliest. If either are there that's the only way.

BPA.

If Hunter or Patterson are BPA on our board then sure we should consider them.

Because late round receivers really work out for us.

We have an aging Washington, a troubled brittle britt, and a slot receiver wright. Yet we don't need receiver help.

We better not take a WR til later if we do, and I don't want us to.

But Hunter is a good player, and best of luck to the kid wherever he goes.

I'd be ok using a 3rdC on a WR, any sooner... and ill cry.

If Patterson makes to the second I would take him if we address needs via free agents

If Hunter slips to the early 3rd or late 2nd, you trade up to get him.

Obviously I'd take him if he is sitting there when our 3rd pick comes around.

Patterson 1st, Hunter 2nd, Da'Rick in the 3rd, and Zach Rodgers as a UDFA!

We were so stacked!!!! ....But we had Dooley and Sunseri. Gods Speed to FSU, good luck with the Italian