So, what if ...

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by edward nigma, Dec 10, 2013.

  1. edward nigma

    edward nigma Starter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    188
    The front office forced Mike Munchak to fire Bruce Matthews (MM would now be responsible for the OL) and Jerry Gray (effectively moving Gregg Williams to the Def. coordinator position) would this get him another year? Let me pose the question this way, would you as a fan be willing to give Munchak another year? Just curious.
    #1
    • High Five High Five x 1
  2. Titanup1982

    Titanup1982 Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    11,367
    Nope.. Why should Munch be forced to make the obvious decision??

    If Munch has to be forced to make a decision that's best for the team, then he doesn't need to be in Nashville, period.
    #2
    • High Five High Five x 9
  3. Big Time Titan

    Big Time Titan Big Time Titan

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    5,904
    I think Munch would/will do anything the FO asks of him to keep his job. I don't completely buy the fact that our horrible OL play is all on Bruce. Looks more to me like our guys just aren't that damn good.

    As for firing Jerry, I'm totally ok with that.
    #3
    • High Five High Five x 1
  4. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    13,078
    Umm no, it's time for a total reboot of this franchise. New owner, new coach, and new QB.
    #4
    • High Five High Five x 1
  5. Old Oiler Fan

    Old Oiler Fan Starter

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    Messages:
    166
    Unfortunately I don't think Munchak has the ability to oversee a creative and innovative offense. He was promoted beyond his capacity it appears. He is a very good offensive line coach and will never be lacking for a job. I also think he would be a good college coach. Penn St would have been a good fit for him.
    #5
  6. Big Time Titan

    Big Time Titan Big Time Titan

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    5,904

    But that's not likely to happen. Munch will be back and so will Jake.
    #6
  7. Tennessy XO

    Tennessy XO @TennessyXO

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    14,276
    No. I'd be pissed.
    #7
  8. SawdustMan

    SawdustMan Pro Bowler Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    12,447
    Not exactly sure what that would solve? Our problems go way beyond Bruce Matthews and Jerry Gray.
    #8
    • High Five High Five x 1
  9. pepsidriver24

    pepsidriver24 @snydzie

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Messages:
    466
    As Kuharsky has always said, they are a package deal. Munch has just as much responsibility for the o-line performance anyway.
    #9
  10. SawdustMan

    SawdustMan Pro Bowler Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    12,447
    Hell, you could very easily argue that Gray has done better as DC this year than Munch has as HC. Our D is 11th in point allowed. 7th in pass defense. 1st in passing TDs allowed.

    Sure there's the Gregg Williams factor. But Munch, Williams and everyone else has said all along "This is Jerry Gray's defense". I know that's about as believable as pigs flying, but it's the story the entire organization put out there. So I certainly don't see why Gray should take the fall while Munch gets a pass.
    #10
    • High Five High Five x 2