To T.O. or not to T.O.? That is the question.

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by Riverman, Mar 6, 2009.

?

To T.O. or not to T. O.? That is the question

Poll closed Mar 11, 2009.
  1. Yes

    33.3%
  2. No

    66.7%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jessestylex

    jessestylex DeadGirlsCantSayNo

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Messages:
    10,484
    i thinks it ok to talk smack if you can back it up, if youre good theres nothing wrong with dissing other guys who cannot compete on your level. if they dont like it then they need to get better.

    i out perform guys at work and i talk smack ( friendly smack) to them cause they cannot keep up. ive actually made guys better by dissing them. TO was trying to get under Romos skin and make him mad enough to pass more and be a better QB. nothing wrong with that. You can say TO was just wanting to be a ball hog, but there wasnt any other WR willing to step up and demand passes so as a leading WR TO had to do it.


    TO and Peyton would be a good combo, cause both want to be the best at what they do. Peyton wants to pass and connect and TO is willing to run down field every snap. slackers bring down the guys that want to be great.
    #11
  2. GMITTS

    GMITTS WHY VY SHOULD BE OUR #3

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,222
    no, TO is a diva who is me, me, me. he wasnt trying to get under romo's skin to make him a better passer. romo was fine...not to mention he was playing with a hand injury on his throwing hand. bottom line is, TO is not good for any team. its a team sport. want to have all the attention on you? join the wwe. i am done on this.
    #12
  3. mcmojo

    mcmojo Starter

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    336
    jessestylex, you voted NO, yet every one of your posts here have been arguing the opposite. What do you actually believe?

    jessestylex wrote:
    Do you work at Goodwill?
    #13
    • High Five High Five x 2
  4. ColtKiller

    ColtKiller Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,556
    TO has 10+ TD's in the past three years. Being number 2 in drops (I'm not sure I buy that) is OK when you have nearly as many touchdowns. He is a great player, signing him to a 1 year deal would be virtually risk free. If he starts causing a rift or acting a damn fool, cut him. Otherwise, he's just gonna outproduce 90% of the receivers in the league, which is A OK with me
    #14
    • High Five High Five x 1
  5. psychotictitan

    psychotictitan Its About That Time...

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,220
  6. jessestylex

    jessestylex DeadGirlsCantSayNo

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Messages:
    10,484
    i work with steel.
    #16
  7. GMITTS

    GMITTS WHY VY SHOULD BE OUR #3

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,222

    last year, TO lead the nfc in drops. not to mention, JF has a good locker room going now...why mess it up because of one player? what would the point be in that? we made the play offs last year with out TO. the cowboys didnt make the playoffs with TO. argue that one...if you can?
    #17
  8. GMITTS

    GMITTS WHY VY SHOULD BE OUR #3

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,222
    and by work with steel you mean that you are really........


    [​IMG]
    :moon2:
    #18
  9. bgtitanfan

    bgtitanfan Guest

    hmm lets see. 1WR TO, 2nd Nate, 3rd Cage. Superbowl?
    #19
  10. GMITTS

    GMITTS WHY VY SHOULD BE OUR #3

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,222
    but all that great individual work has gotten how many championships???
    #20
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.