Ty Law, a possible Titan?

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by Spinnaker, Mar 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Spinnaker

    Spinnaker Guest

    The Tennessean today reported Ty Laws Agent acknowledging that the titans are one the the front runners when it comes to interest in teams with Ty Law. I think it would be a great asset.
    #1
  2. Tonye209

    Tonye209 209 Cali

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    114
    if we add ty law....forget the playoffs can i say SUPER BOWL contender!@!!!!!!!!! brings back memories of the 99 season 1 yd :'((((
    #2
  3. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,988
    Don't get on the Superbowl bandwagon just yet.

    Offense is still suspect - expecially the O-line. No hopkins but a new tackle. The line wasnt the best last season and we are retaining two gaurds, a new experienced center who should help it out but the new Right Tackle will be interesting (may use Stewart, draft Brick and leaves Roos there)

    McNair - if around - needs to get a repore with the WRs, it was a problem last season.

    Running Backs - no 100 yard games, no 1000 yard season from Henry or Brown.

    Defense still has Schwartz as the DC and the DTs and opposite DE (Odom, LaBoy) need to perform all the time, not some of the time.
    #3
  4. Titans2008

    Titans2008 Camp Fodder

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,525
    Ty Law is not the same Ty Law you saw two seasons ago. The Patriots are a very smart organization. There's a reason they got rid of him despite him being the best player on their defense at the time. Yes, I know he got twelve picks, but that wasn't covering a number 1 or 2 receiver. And now he's a year older and probably still wants a big pay day that we can't afford...
    #4
  5. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Messages:
    46,988
    Patriots got rid of Ty Law because of his money and that he wouldn't take a pay cut.

    Ty Law wasn't the covering the #1 reciever? The Jets have no CBs, of course he was covering the #1 reciever. Who else was David Barrett? please.
    You don't pay what the Jets paid Ty Law to not be the #1.
    #5
  6. metal957

    metal957 In"Vince"Able

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    529
    Ok I could live with him here "If the Price is Right!"
    #6
  7. Riverman

    Riverman That may be....

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    8,795
    What does this say about Pac-man or Hill?
    #7
  8. Ewker

    Ewker Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,358
    who or Hill
    #8
  9. Fry

    Fry Hatin' is what I do.

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    26,424
    i doubt i says anything about pacman. teams dont give up on a top 10 pick who got better as the season went on. hill on the other hand, doesnt have anything promised to him.
    #9
  10. SEC 330 BIPOLAR

    SEC 330 BIPOLAR jive turkey

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,087
    I thought we were solid at corner. I'm big on Pac and Reynaldo.
    Hell, I even think Woolfolk is going to be ok...

    Beckham, Waddell & Gardner are nobody special to me.
    Seems like going out and getting Law is overkill...
    then again there is plenty I don't know.

    edit note: why is this thread in the draft forum?
    #10
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.