Rumor We are keeping Mularkey?

A new GM (at least a decent one) would want their guy as head coach.

So, to add insult to injury, this would be a sign that Webster could possibly be retained.

 

I saw that..."Leaning Safe?"

 

Yep, I think you're correct. Which means we will be in the exact same position next year at this time....

 

A lot of our players have gone to bat for Mularkey. If the owners are listening to the players then we may be stuck with Mularkey.

Webster tho, Idk how he keeps his job.

If Webster is re-signed then I'm going to take that as 1.) He never had much influence in prior drafts, or 2.) Our owners are morons...

 

It also means they need to replace Underwood with another interim President, because it also shows how much of an idiot he is.

 

Yea if we stay the course with dumb and dumber, then wtf is Underwood even here for?

 

How in the f*** is sticking with Webster or Mularkey playing it safe? If they mean by using the leverage they have over the lot of them because they both have sucked ass, so they can re-sign RW and Mularkey to super cheap deals and not affect their bottom line then I'm done with this chit organization. Sometimes these folks look at their franchise with too much of the business side glasses.

 

Here's the story on Profootballtalk:

Could Mike Mularkey get the permanent job in Tennessee? | ProFootballTalk

 

But but but....we will get the top pick in the draft and everyone is happy again right?