Why does it seem like everyone...

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by Titans2008, Mar 13, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Puck

    Puck Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    13,051
    agreed

    we have to take the approach that at some point in the year, PacMan will likely be sat - by either : the coach / the NFL / the penal system
    #11
  2. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    12,806
    And right there is why we signed Harper.
    #12
  3. LazyManJackson

    LazyManJackson Starter

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,986
    We should just keep Finnegan at nickel, he played very well at that position last year, he is very unpoven at cornerback, one of the many reasons we signed Harper...
    #13
  4. PAtitansfan53

    PAtitansfan53 Kush & OJ

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,407
    He played for Samsford or something college which is D-II so he didn't get much recognition. He got Defensive player of the year as a senior. IDC if he's a 7th rounder he is much better than Rey Hill will ever be he is faster,stronger, better ball skills, and will lay the wood despite his small size which is another reason he was snubbed on draft day just be glad we got him. Is there a reason Tom Brady was a 6th rounder sure but things change when you get to the NFL.

    And by faster I'm talking about game speed which Hill has none of he was just timed fast. Finnegan is fast, quick, and smooth which is just as important as speed which he has plenty of. Hill is a bit stiff in the hips and has marginal explosion.

    I'm not saying Rey isn't good but he's best as a #3 for now and can work on those things like looking back while running, explosion,hips,ect. He's only 24 so it's yet to be seen if he can't be a quality #2.
    #14
  5. Finnegan was a steal in the draft for being taken in the 7th round.Hes a versatile player that can play the nickel and CB if needed.Hes proved he can be a consistant player in dime and nickel situations and he proved that he can play Corner if need be.Hes not a bust and will never be one because thats he works to hard.You wanna talk about bust just bring up Andre Wolfolk
    #15
  6. Titans2008

    Titans2008 Camp Fodder

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,525
    He never had a bad game. When he got his opportunity to show his skills at cornerback, he looked miles better than anyone we have but Pac-Man. I don't get it. He must really be doing something to piss someone off off the field.
    #16
  7. GoTitans3801

    GoTitans3801 Forward Progress!

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    7,640
    You need depth at corner, and even with him we could have been starting finnegan and hill, with no depth, if something happened to pac. There's nothing wrong with having four strong CBs, especially since one will get plenty of time in the nickle.
    #17
  8. SupDawg

    SupDawg Guest

    So would you be okay with Harper and Hill being our starters? That scares me. :gag: :gag:
    #18
  9. i think ive probably been the biggest advocate for finegann on here
    #19
  10. smili

    smili Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    864
    Does anyone know if Michael Waddell will be back after his knee injury last year? He was OK in depth also, and had been improving imho.
    #20
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.