wonderlic scores

I wonder when Gloat will make fun of Vince in this thread...over/under set at 23 minutes...


:dead:

 

Tracy Porter and Tracy Williams both with a 4 Take the Wonderlic Award this year.

I still put 0 stock into it.

 

Its important for QBs. Not so important for other positions. The wonderlic is extremely easy. If you score bad, you'll probably have a hard time tying your shoes, much less reading a defense.

 

to further illustrate how stupid I think it is, Wallace Gilberry got a 17 the 1st time, and a 50 the next. That's rediculous...

 

Here's a sample of the Wonderlic Test, and you all have probably done something similar... The hard part isn't the questions, its making sure you answer all of them. if you hang around on one question, that's where you go wrong.

http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228test.html

 

"That is what I keep telling everyone!"

Signed,
David Carr

I believe he got a 37 on the wonderlic .... that worked out well for him

 

Actually I think that is to say that he answered 17 correct out of the 50 he answered. The majority of players obviously didn't get through all 50 questions.

 

:bonk2: ohhh ok now that makes sense


Wow, poor guys... Tracy actually got a 4 through 23 problems :(( I thought he redeemed himself by scoring higher.



My opinion still stands, its pointless.

 

It's not pointless. It's proof or whether or not you're a moron. P.s. - David Carrs problems weren't mental.