2017 College Football Thread

Discussion in 'Other Sports' started by Fry, Aug 3, 2017.

  1. Tuckfro42

    Tuckfro42 Frozen Donkey Wheel

    2,921
    911
    469
    You’re argument is “they’re Bama.” That’s crap. Just because you don’t agree they should be in the playoffs doesn’t mean the committee just picked them because “they’re Bama.”

    The committee obviously believed that Bama was a better choice than OSU and USC. Maybe they will release their conversations and criteria, maybe not.
  2. HurrayTitans!

    HurrayTitans! Starter

    5,296
    1,521
    459
    I think the committee may have seen Wisconsin as better than Bama but couldn't see them as better than OSU after losing to them but they saw Bama as better than OSU because of the Iowa loss.
    USC was too far down before their game and UCF just doesn't count.