Biggest Positional Need?

Discussion in 'Tennessee Titans and NFL Talk' started by xpmar9x, Jan 2, 2013.

?

Biggest Positional Need?

  1. DE

    1 vote(s)
    2.2%
  2. DT

    5 vote(s)
    11.1%
  3. OG/C

    30 vote(s)
    66.7%
  4. CB

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. S

    7 vote(s)
    15.6%
  6. ILB

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. WR/TE

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. QB

    2 vote(s)
    4.4%
  9. RB

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. OT

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. SoCalTitan867

    SoCalTitan867 Special Teams Standout

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    700
    Has to be an og/c. It's been an issue for way too long. I really like the idea of moving back and getting an extra second. We could address og/c, SS and DT all in 2 rounds.
    #31
  2. Titan43

    Titan43 Starter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2009
    Messages:
    3,019
    OG/C has to be the choice because that is technically 2 positions. LOL

    I picked OG/C becuase I do think that is our biggest need, but I don't think it has to be addressed rd 1 of the draft. I would 1st look to FA, then maybe rds 2-3 of the draft.

    Round 1, I am looking at DT (specifically star) ... its still early enough that no one's draft position is set, so its not like a pipe dream (at least not yet). Get an impact DT and it makes every one look better. A SS doesn't do that. SS is a big need, but it just fixes 1 position. DT can fix several. And I do like Marks/Casey/Martin, but they are penetration guys. They are pass rushers. They can't take on the double team. They aren't clogging up the middle of the line keeping OLs off our LBs. They aren't run stuffers and space eaters. That is what this D is missing.

    Get a DT like that, and the other DTs/DEs will get to the passer better, which will make the Safeties and CBs look better as well.

    Not saying we should ignore S, but if we have a chance to get a guy like star, then we HAVE to take it.
    #32
    • High Five High Five x 1
  3. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,397
    Looks like it's settled that OG/C is our #1 need.
    #33
  4. Ensconatus

    Ensconatus Namaste

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    9,761
    I think it's easily our biggest need. Although unless we trade back, even with Warmack on the board, I don't see us picking OL at 10
    #34
  5. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,397
    Hopefully we can just sign Andy Levitre (and resigned Velasco) and get some D playmakers early instead. Then all we need is another starting G or C (could be recv'd in the 3rd-4th or FA).
    #35
    • High Five High Five x 1
  6. LANGSTER

    LANGSTER Starter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,886
    nfl coaching staff and nfl caliber S's
    #36
  7. ncaalover12

    ncaalover12 Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,240
    Don't worry we'll draft another LB like Te'o or something.
    #37
  8. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,397
    #38
    • High Five High Five x 1
  9. TorontoTitanFan

    TorontoTitanFan Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,198
    #39
    • High Five High Five x 1
  10. xpmar9x

    xpmar9x Vote for Pedro

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,397
    I would be happy with all 3 of them as well.

    We really need to cut Michael Griffin, but I just can't see it happening.
    #40