Could you even imagine if we didn't have Henry?

so like last year but with a better line. still can't believe we won a game with those pathetic backs. Mariota would lead the team with 40 rushing yards.

 

Meh, Henry is good, but I think a starting CB in that spot would have sufficed better with Murray playing so well.

Henry is good depth though, I don't think anyone expected Murray to be this filthy besides @titanthakur

 

I hated the Henry pick, but I'm glad we did it in hindsight. It was the Dodd and Johnson picks that probably should've been different.

I really wanted Alexander with one of those 2nd round picks, but I don't think he's had much playing time yet, so it's hard to say how he'll pan out.

In hindsight, it probably would've been best to go Hunter Henry (or Sterling Shepard) at 33, along with D Henry and whoever else.

 

Murray would be leading the league in rushing with 977 yards. Lol

 

I too hated the Henry pick at The time but I love it now. I can admit I was wrong.

I doubt a DB in the the 2nd would have been anything more than depth considering the fascination our coaching staff has with below average Vet DBs.

 

So far the Dodd pick is questionable, but it is early yet. I probably wouldnt have picked him at that spot to be a backup, but he still has some time.

 

Yea maybe the edge guy for Jaguars (can't spell his name right), or the CB in san fran are both getting good praise early.

Still, hindsight 20/20 and all that.

 

I wanted Hunter Henry as well. Had we got him as well as D Henry we'd have been set at TE as well as RB.

 

Henry is straight dominating most the time hes in, looks like hes a step faster than everyone around him, I cant wait til hes the guy full-time.