Ginn Jr. VS Jamal Anderson?

btw, you do realize he never caught more than 60 passes
and only scored 15 TD's in 3 years

by comparison:
Dwayne Jarrett caught 91 balls in '05
1274 yards receiving
and has 41 TD's in 3 years

DJ is a much better prospect (on paper) and he's not higly recommended
so where would that leave GInn ?

believe when I say, you are a minority when it comes to taking Ginn
Meachum is (imo) a MUCH better prospect for receiver and I really don't want him either ... and I'm a Vols fan

 

Considered for MVP? Lol. What dream world do you live in man?

 

^ perhaps he means "Special Teams Player of the Week" - which btw, does not warrant the #19 overall

 

furthermore,

the whole "WE NEED A WR" campaign is OVERRATED

yes, it's true that we need to have guys that can run proper routes and timing patterns, and more importantly guys that can catch; but in this "spread the ball" approach , we don't need to overlook a more pressing need in Defense for a guy that can return a kick and maybe get you some sparkle on 3rd and Long

 

Dante Hall was considerd for the MVP....

In around Week 9 or so when he was kickin arse

 

I'd be ok if we took Ginn, but he isn't my choice. I think people here and everywhere else forget that Ohio State was supposed to win the championship easily. So easily many of us didn't watch. And we saw why they didn't. It was ONE player. Once he was hurt, that game was over.

 

Rex Grossman was considered for MVP in week 5.

 

I don't think you understand the difference between some sportscaster on ESPN mentioning someone's name for MVP to get a rise from an audience and the voters actually giving consideration. A purely special teams player will never win MVP.

 

Hold on....if no one watched, how were they able to see anything about the game? :ha:

No, Ted Ginn wouldn't have made that much of a difference. They lost because they were outmatched by a SEC powerhouse. Ohio State was overhyped and Florida was underated. I was one of the few people who predicted Florida to win (by 10), and they won by 27. You can't tell me Ted Ginn would make a 27-point difference.

They would've had to have Vince Young to win that game.

 

wplatham is correct. Obviously Ginn was a good college player and Ohio State was hurt by losing him, but you can't use a pre-game prediction as gospel. That's just dumb. I feel a Herm Edwards "that's why they play the game" speech coming on.