STAR WARS

Discussion in 'Movies/TV' started by The Playmaker, Oct 30, 2012.

  1. nickmsmith

    nickmsmith Most poverty RB core.

    11,610
    5,200
    669
    I don't believe that.. I believe the opposite. A new movie will reignite interest in Star Wars, that's been dormant for almost a decade.

    A 1978 toy of a stormtrooper will not decrease in value because of a new movie. If not for reignited interest in the films, in 30 years, the toys would be worth less, or worthless.
    #21
  2. RTH

    RTH Meh...

    7,339
    2,359
    509
    Because Lucas hasn't diluted the Star Wars pool enough, already?

    Damage has been done... I'd like to see what someone else can do with it.
    #22
  3. RavensShallBurn

    RavensShallBurn Ruck the Favens

    22,557
    9,391
    939
    And in comes the troll...

    Star Wars sucks.
    #23
    • High Five High Five x 1
  4. Titans Eternal

    Titans Eternal Got the swagger of a cripple

    13,995
    8,055
    569
    I like Sith, not star wars.
    #24
  5. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    14,006
    2,549
    579
    After episodes 1-3 there isn't a whole lot more damage to do. I don't think the value of the Stars Wars name will go down I just think they're going to branch off into something else. Look at all the comics, books, games, and mini series they've had since the originals trilogy, there is so much they can do. We also have to remember nothing will be as great as the original 3, so trying to compare every single little thing to them is a waste of time.
    #25
  6. Gunny

    Gunny Lord and Master Tip Jar Donor

    48,383
    6,913
    1,309
    I read that they're doing an original story, so nothing based on the books/games.
    #26
  7. GeronimoJackson

    GeronimoJackson Starter

    5,073
    1,980
    409
    There's plenty of more stories to tell on the big screen, like Shadows of the Empire or Darth Bane or Death Troopers or Tales of the Bounty Hunters.

    Not a fan of Disney doing Star Wars though, I was hoping any future Star War movies would go the Nolan route and be less campy...cuz most things I loved from my childhood, if I watch it now, I'll look back and think how great it was, but with the Star Wars movies, when I watch it now, I think "wow this sh*t's pretty lame when I watch it now."
    #27
  8. nickmsmith

    nickmsmith Most poverty RB core.

    11,610
    5,200
    669
    I hope you're talking about the 90s-2000s ones.. cause the 70s and 80s ones are still great. Had personality. That's what the new ones were lacking. Han Solo type character who was a wise-a#@. The new ones were all british accented stiffs and CGI most of the time.

    Another good thing about the originals is that they were made in the 70s, and they could only rely on CGI so much at the time.

    The only cool character to come out of the new series was Darth Maul, and he died after the first movie.
    #28
  9. Finnebosch

    Finnebosch I am vengeance.

    2,599
    1,191
    519
    From my understanding they are doing a sequel trilogy of the original Star Wars movies staring Han, Luke, and Leia; and if that's the case I'll be disappointed. I don't want a recast of the characters I love.
    #29
  10. jplusip

    jplusip Starter

    2,497
    969
    209
    Mark Hamil, Harrison Ford, and Carrie Fisher are all still alive. :p
    #30