Updated Published Mock Links

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by Riverman, Apr 3, 2017.

  1. Riverman

    Riverman That may be.... Tip Jar Donor

    12,042
    4,460
    849
    Still think we trade with Browns and get our 52 back along with swapping outer second 3rd with Cleveland s first pick on the 3rd.
    #21
  2. The Playmaker

    The Playmaker pineapple pizza party

    15,482
    3,239
    909
    I disagree with this. In Lebeau's defense having 3 good Safeties is more important than having a couple shut down CBs.

    >Byard is versatile enough to play SS or FS.
    >Cyprien can only play SS
    >Searcy hasn't lived up to his contract and may get cut.

    Drafting Adams or even Hooker gives us a very versatile core at Safety.

    If the Titans don't trust Lattimore's injury history but still want a DB we should have no problem with Adams or Hooker.
    #22
  3. TitansAC4

    TitansAC4 Starter

    451
    56
    124
    Hooker at 5
    Best CB available at 18

    Fix that defense.
    #23
    • High Five High Five x 1
  4. lilkhmerkid4u

    lilkhmerkid4u Somebody Saveeeeeee Meee!

    2,183
    512
    429
    We goin' Davis at #5 and Williams/Ross at #18
    #24
    • High Five High Five x 1
    • LOL LOL x 1
    • Bullsh*t Bullsh*t x 1
    • Unreadable Unreadable x 1
  5. TitansWrath

    TitansWrath Pro Bowler

    2,725
    1,476
    519
    That would be odd.

    If we go two pass catchers (we won't) I'd rather have one wr and one of Howard Njoku McCaffery.
    #25
    • High Five High Five x 1
  6. 615nick

    615nick Starter

    1,858
    688
    169
    The issue i have with this thought, is that searcy doesn't suck. No he's not the best, but he's in the top half of the league. Why draft any s at 5 when we already have 3 pretty good s? It just doesn't make since unless you really think they are going to be big upgrades or you are strictly building for the future. In "win now" mode s at 5 is one of the dumbest decisions we could make. Ultimately a trade down is ideal, but if forced to pick, a s doesn't make a lot of since.
    #26
    • High Five High Five x 1
    • Cheers Cheers x 1
    • Hit the Target Hit the Target x 1
  7. Broken Arrow

    Broken Arrow Starter

    1,977
    531
    169
    Searcy won't be cut IMO.

    If you want to crunch some numbers --- we could be (if we draft S top 5) paying 15-18 million a yr for a SS position that constantly has rotation......

    CB with just Logan Ryan (realistically) takes priority over a crowded Safety room........ JMac's cutting sent condolence flowers to a possibility of a safety at 5.

    And Byard needs freed up to be the interception machine, as opposed to another box safety....

    Which would make 4!!
    #27
    • High Five High Five x 1
  8. Ontario Titan

    Ontario Titan Pro Bowler

    6,180
    1,643
    669
    I could see Adams pairing nicely with Byard, Cyprien I think will be more of a LB than a S with us.

    I really can't see them going WR at 5&18...WR &TE would make more sense if that's the route they choose.
    D & Offence would be fine as well but I want a killer D. The offence showed last year they can put points on the board, it was the D that couldn't hold the lead.
    #28
    • High Five High Five x 1
  9. JR1980

    JR1980 Starter

    6,236
    2,087
    459
    #29
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. Jwill1919

    Jwill1919 Coach

    6,293
    1,547
    679
    I don't think I'd be happy at all with Williams at 12 and McDowell at 18. McD is basically what we heard Austin Johnson was. We need CB somewhere in the first 30 picks.
    #30
    • High Five High Five x 1