Who do you want at 5?

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by titanthakur, Apr 4, 2017.

Who do you want at pick 5?

Poll closed May 4, 2017.
  1. Jamal Adams

    6 vote(s)
    8.7%
  2. Jonathan Allen

    9 vote(s)
    13.0%
  3. Corey Davis

    7 vote(s)
    10.1%
  4. Solomon Thomas

    3 vote(s)
    4.3%
  5. Marshon Lattimore

    21 vote(s)
    30.4%
  6. OJ Howard

    7 vote(s)
    10.1%
  7. Malik Hooker

    7 vote(s)
    10.1%
  8. John Ross

    2 vote(s)
    2.9%
  9. Haason Reddick

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. Mike Williams

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  11. Other

    7 vote(s)
    10.1%
  1. titanthakur

    titanthakur Starter

    3,673
    902
    169
    Taking a poll to see where we stand as a gotitans nation. Assuming Garrett is gone. Answer poll please and thank you. Votes will not be visible to public so don't worry about shame. Name who if other please.
    #1
  2. ImATitan

    ImATitan Starter

    9,496
    2,569
    479
    I voted for Marson Lattimore.

    Malik Hooker, Jamal Adams or Jonathan Allen also make sense. Allen isn't a need, but may be too good to pass on.

    I won't throw my remote at the television if they pick Howard, Williams or Davis, but 5 may be rich for those 3.
    #2
    • High Five High Five x 1
  3. xhrr

    xhrr Starter

    3,688
    1,430
    369
    If we take any offensive players other than Howard or Davis at five I'll lose it. Thomas, Reddick, Allen, and Hooker would be fine if we go defense. Adams is good but seems redundant.
    #3
    • Hit the Target Hit the Target x 1
  4. SawdustMan

    SawdustMan Superhero Squad Tip Jar Donor

    20,648
    10,723
    989
    A damn TE in the lead. lol
    #4
    • Hit the Target Hit the Target x 2
    • LOL LOL x 1
  5. HurrayTitans!

    HurrayTitans! Starter

    4,728
    1,386
    419
    I vote Lattimore. We need a CB, he's ranked well above the rest.
    #5
  6. ImATitan

    ImATitan Starter

    9,496
    2,569
    479
    You can't behind Mike Williams at 5, but Reddick at 5 is fine?
    #6
    • Hit the Target Hit the Target x 1
  7. Titans2004

    Titans2004 Pro Bowler

    3,490
    1,021
    629
    I really have a hard time choosing between Howard, Hooker and Davis.

    I voted Howard because I think he is the safest pick. He is a complete player with freakish athletic ability who fills a need.

    I won't complain if we get ourselves another "freak". Hooker has monstrous hands and great instincts and athletic ability. The only part of his game that I don't like is that he isn't very physical in the run game.

    Davis sure looks like the real deal. Would love to have his 40 time and 3 cone times. I'm just not a fan of drafting WRs early. I think a smart good qb can make up for a stud wr.
    #7
  8. xhrr

    xhrr Starter

    3,688
    1,430
    369
    Yeah just not the biggest Mike Will fan. He made his living off contested catches in college. I think his production could be hard to replicate in the pros against even tighter coverage. There's no doubt he has strong hands, can block well, plus has elite size but his timed speed which is all over the place depending on where you look doesn't seem to translate to the field. Routes are teachable sure but he needs to really apply himself to the finer details of being a WR. Classic boom or bust.

    I can't see us taking him with all the talk of wanting polished players. Mularkey and JRob have harped on the intracacies of the position. They were pretty harsh on our WR groups inconsistencies in route running and it got a coach fired.
    #8
    • Cheers Cheers x 1
  9. titanthakur

    titanthakur Starter

    3,673
    902
    169
    Prof pic Corey Davis but didn't vote for him... ouch
    #9
  10. xhrr

    xhrr Starter

    3,688
    1,430
    369
    Haha Howard is the only offensive player I would take over him. I think he has a two fold effect on this team because of his blocking and receiving ability. Being as committed as we are to the running game he seems like a better scheme fit on the surface. I still love Corey Davis and would be ecstatic if we landed either of them. Or both :)
    #10