Welcome to goTitans.com! Log in or sign up to be a part of the best Tennessee Titans fan site available.

Xbox One

Discussion in 'Video Games' started by xpmar9x, May 21, 2013.

Watchers:
This thread is being watched by 5 users.
  1. Titans Eternal Got the swagger of a cripple

    Pollard
    Messages:
    12,928
    Moolah:
    $4,763
    It's money. With the ps2, not only were you buying a ps2, but also a ps1. It costs money to add the hardware onto the next console. Since Sony (idk about ms) loses money on every console sale, having them be backwards compatible as well just adds more lost profit- not only because of having to pay more for the hardware, but because it then made the ps1 completely irrelevant the instant ps2 released.

    That's my take.
    RTH, GTFO my pancakz, GoT and 1 other person high five this.
    • Tip Jar Donor

    Gunny Lord and Master

    Wright
    Messages:
    46,105
    Moolah:
    $4,355
    They can't do BC because the architecture from PS3 - PS4 is massively different. It simply wasn't possible.
    RTH high fives this.
  2. RTH Meh...

    Wycheck
    Messages:
    4,642
    Moolah:
    $8,698
    While I would love backwards compatibility - some of my favorite games are on the older systems - I read that the technology was so different from one system to the other that in order to read and process the disc of an old platform game, the actual components of that older platform would need to be integrated into the newer system.

    Bigger, bulkier systems that would cost a LOT more - they'd have to re-manufacture those components from the older systems. It's simply not cost-effective.

    That's the reason I was given when I inquired about it... it's a decent reason. Though, I'd still want the backwards compatibility.
    • Tip Jar Donor

    Gunny Lord and Master

    Wright
    Messages:
    46,105
    Moolah:
    $4,355
    I really don't see how Gaikai can stream a PS3 game either. PS1 and 2 possibly, 3 is a different matter.
  3. RTH Meh...

    Wycheck
    Messages:
    4,642
    Moolah:
    $8,698
    Yeah, I'm curious about this, as well.
    I remember when the PS2 came out how Sony completely changed the way video games are made/programmed to run on a system. That was a mocking point of the original Xbox - that Game Programmers will not like having to conform to the PS2's way of making games and make all games for the Xbox. Didn't work out that way - too much money involved for a developer to not make games for the PS2.

    So, with it being so DIFFERENT... I'm sure the PS3 is the same. That seems to be a lot of different ways to stream games and process them on a single system. Also, PS3 games are VAST... Isn't the Last of US like 20+ gigs or something..?
    • Tip Jar Donor

    Gunny Lord and Master

    Wright
    Messages:
    46,105
    Moolah:
    $4,355
    Some of the higher end exclusives were pushing 50Gb I think (MGS4). But yeah, some are huge.
  4. Tennessy XO @TennessyXO

    McNair
    Messages:
    12,115
    Moolah:
    $9,257
    The bullet we dodged


    [IMG]
    Scarecrow and Titans Eternal high five this.
  5. Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Martin
    Messages:
    27,428
    Moolah:
    $15,237
    ... by fixing it.
  6. Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Martin
    Messages:
    27,428
    Moolah:
    $15,237

    Sh** like this kills me. "Sticking with the PS4"...

    This early? Why? I don't get why consumers predetermine their decision based on absolutely nothing but some weird loyalty to a brand they developed.
  7. Deuce Wayne Damnit, I cant find my driving moccasins anywhere!

    Martin
    Messages:
    27,428
    Moolah:
    $15,237

    My L?

    I told you guys it'd be changed. It would have been even with minimal backlash.

    And if it weren't, it still was a petty thing to b*tch and cry about from people that already decided they were going to buy a PS4 months before either one was announced.

Share This Page